Aug 14, 2017 · This demonstrates that surveillance, though may lack privacy, will help security and may catch criminals and terrorists. In conclusion, the evidence clearly establishes the fact that America should value security way more than privacy. If we no longer have security we might be ruled over again, and then we won’t have any privacy left.

Governments legally spying on citizens? We discuss the privacy vs security and freedom vs safety dilemmas, and in particular if government mass surveillance programs are justified. Join our debate in cyber-security and vote in our poll (below) Debate created by Paul McNeil Feb 24, 2016 · As Apple’s standoff with federal courts reignites the debate over privacy versus security, some may wonder just how much American intelligence policies have changed since Sept. 11. Security, on the other hand, refers to how your personal information is protected. Your data — different details about you — may live in a lot of places. That can challenge both your privacy and your security. Some people regard privacy and security as pretty much the same thing. That’s because the two sometimes overlap in a connected world. The debate of the topic privacy versus security has been going on for a while. Most people believe privacy is more important, giving people the chance to be relaxed without anyone watching them, literally or figuratively speaking. Mar 10, 2014 · When Edward Snowden leaked massive troves of information about the National Security Agency's collection of electronic information, he started a debate over the tradeoffs between security and privacy.

Apr 10, 2013 · On Wednesday, the House Intelligence Committee held closed door meetings about the controversial cybersecurity bill that is scheduled to hit the House floor next week.

Feb 25, 2016 · Is losing privacy ultimately the price we pay for peaceful streets and freedom from terror attacks? Taken from Inside The Dark Web. Want to share your views Aug 15, 2018 · The privacy vs. security debate will continue to rage on for some time, but it’s safe to say that it won’t go on forever. While privacy and cybersecurity protocols will differ from one industry to another (based on regulation), it will be critical to find a balance to maintain brand value and business continuity.

Data privacy compliance and national security seem to be in opposition—with one coming at the expense of the other. It’s time to instead focus the conversation on identifying opportunities for the private sector and government to collaborate.

What are the implications of this crucial debate for privacy and national security as well as for criminal and civil litigations in state and federal court? Topics Mobile devices Constitutional law Criminal litigation Technology